[MAINT]: Repository maintenance #441
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
CRITICAL
Stale
WIP
bug
concept
coordinate
dataset
dependencies
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
github_actions
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
maintenance
maps
marker
mask
on hold
parcellation
preprocess
question
ready
storage
template-space
triage
wontfix
No milestone
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
juaml/junifer!441
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "chore/ruff-format"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This PR does general repository maintenance by updating
.pre-commit-config.yaml, replacingblackwithruff-formatand updating tool configs.Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is
91.66667%with1 linein your changes missing coverage. Please review.❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (91.66%) is below the target coverage (95.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.
Additional details and impacted files
91.00% <91.66%> (+5.22%)Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
100.00% <ø> (ø)91.36% <ø> (ø)92.92% <ø> (ø)96.00% <100.00%> (ø)95.34% <ø> (+57.84%)100.00% <ø> (+61.90%)100.00% <ø> (+20.28%)100.00% <ø> (+50.00%)76.92% <ø> (+49.42%)75.00% <ø> (+27.38%)... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
https://juaml.github.io/junifer/pr-preview/pr-441/
Built to branch
gh-pagesat 2025-04-03 16:51 UTC.Preview will be ready when the GitHub Pages deployment is complete.
Doesn't this PR needs to be rebased or merged on top of another? Seems that its adding covereage and adding the coordinates registry.
This PR is already rebased on main and it's removing the leftover files from coordinates and masks.
@fraimondo should be good for review now, the patch coverage is red but it's not a problem.
@fraimondo Can we get this in or do you have some review comments?