[BUG]: Fix storage functions #84

Closed
opened 2022-09-15 21:58:58 +00:00 by fraimondo · 0 comments
fraimondo commented 2022-09-15 21:58:58 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

We have store_timeseries, store_matrix2d, store_df... etc. Everything is a mess right now.

Expected Behavior

I expect to have a simple API to store

Steps To Reproduce

Try to create a marker that works with both VBM and BOLD, impossible to test storage.

Environment

Junifer main

Relevant log output

No response

Anything else?

No response

### Is there an existing issue for this? - [X] I have searched the existing issues ### Current Behavior We have `store_timeseries`, `store_matrix2d`, `store_df`... etc. Everything is a mess right now. ### Expected Behavior I expect to have a simple API to store ### Steps To Reproduce Try to create a marker that works with both VBM and BOLD, impossible to test storage. ### Environment ```markdown Junifer main ``` ### Relevant log output _No response_ ### Anything else? _No response_
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
juaml/junifer#84
No description provided.