[MARKER]: Estimating smoothness of an image #162

Closed
opened 2022-12-22 11:30:33 +00:00 by LeSasse · 3 comments
LeSasse commented 2022-12-22 11:30:33 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Which marker do you want to include?

SPM and AFNI both provide functionality to estimate smoothness of a given nifti image, so it would be nice to have a similar marker in junifer. There is a nice blog overview about it here

Is there any publication or available code?

This is the link to the AFNI documentation of the estimation program. This is the link to the SPM implementation which includes some references to associated publications.

Do you have a sample code that implements this outside of junifer?

No response

Anything else to say?

No response

### Which marker do you want to include? SPM and AFNI both provide functionality to estimate smoothness of a given nifti image, so it would be nice to have a similar marker in junifer. There is a nice blog overview about it [here](http://andysbrainblog.blogspot.com/2012/06/smoothing-in-afni.html) ### Is there any publication or available code? This is the link to the [AFNI documentation](https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/program_help/3dFWHMx.html) of the estimation program. This is the link to the [SPM implementation](https://github.com/neurodebian/spm12/blob/master/spm_est_smoothness.m) which includes some references to associated publications. ### Do you have a sample code that implements this outside of junifer? _No response_ ### Anything else to say? _No response_
fraimondo commented 2023-03-31 08:13:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@LeSasse how urgent do you need this? Shall I add it to the next release cycle (0.0.3 alpha2)?

@LeSasse how urgent do you need this? Shall I add it to the next release cycle (0.0.3 alpha2)?
LeSasse commented 2023-03-31 10:47:42 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

It was a feature that @kaurao was interested in, but as far as I understand there is no particular urgency at the moment.

It was a feature that @kaurao was interested in, but as far as I understand there is no particular urgency at the moment.
github-actions[bot] commented 2025-09-17 02:01:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
juaml/junifer#162
No description provided.